Court dismissed the 2009 writ petition as infructuous due to non-appearance, reserving liberty to file a recall/restoration application if cause of action survives.
Petitioner granted liberty to file recall/restoration application if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12962 of 2009
Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kr. Srivastava,M.K.Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.D.Pandey,Sunita Agarwal
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner or the respondents.
This is a writ petition of the year 2009.
It appears that the writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as such.
However, if any cause of action still survives in this writ petition, the petitioner will be at liberty to file a recall/restoration application.
Order Date :- 23.10.2018
nd
Navin Kumar
State Of U.P.
B. Amit Sthalekar
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
