A writ petition filed in 2009 was dismissed for want of prosecution in a call-over proceeding where no counsel appeared. The interim order, if any, stood vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20812 of 2009
Petitioner :- Sanno Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Case called out.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
This writ petition is of the year 2009.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.10.2018 Nitin Verma
Sanno
State Of U.P.
B. Amit Sthalekar
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
