A 2009 writ petition regarding a fisheries lease was dismissed as infructuous due to the expiration of the lease period.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14934 of 2009
Petitioner :- Ram Karan Nishad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.K. Shukla
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Case called out. No one appears for the petitioner.
This is a writ petition of 2009. The petitioner was granted fisheries lease for the period of one year. The period of one year has already expired and therefore, in our opinion, the writ petition has become infructuous. We may also note that there is no interim order operating in the case.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.10.2018 nd
Ram Karan Nishad
State Of U.P.
B. Amit Sthalekar
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
