The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the counsel's request, allowing liberty to file a fresh petition. The order had no substantive legal holdings or reasoning beyond the procedural dismissal.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14957 of 2018
Petitioner :- Triloki Nath Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Sri G. P. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are some mistakes in the writ petition and some annexures have been wrongly filed and, therefore, this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
Order Date :- 16.7.2018 Ak/
Triloki Nath Srivastava
State Of U.P
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
