Gazala (Corpus) v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was not pressed by the learned counsel and was dismissed accordingly without substantive adjudication.
The petition was not pressed by the learned counsel and was dismissed accordingly without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3258 of 2018
Petitioner :- Gazala (Corpus) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Preetam Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Sri Preetam Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted by making endorsement on the first page of the petition that he does not want to press the instant petition as it has become infructuous.
The instant petitioner is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 6.8.2018
rkg
Gazala (Corpus)
State Of U.P.
Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court