Section 10. Vacancies, etc., not to invalidate proceedings of the Board

Petition to quash an FIR under the PC-PNDT Act alleging illegal sex-determination ultrasound during a decoy raid. The Court held proceedings were vitiated as the raid and complaint were not authorised by the District Appropriate Authority, quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

PCPNDT Act 1994 Sections 17, 17(1)(a), 22, 23, 28 and Rules 8, 9, 10, 17, 18; KPME Act 2017 Sections 19, 19A; 'appropriate authority'; delegation to Assistant Commissioner and bar on sub-delegation; maintainability of complaint by incompetent complainant; vitiation and quashing of cognizance;

Allowed bail to Vicky, an applicant accused of multiple offences under the PNDT Act and IPC, by furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties. The Court distinguished a prior Supreme Court precedent to support the grant of bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.

The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by accepting the counsel's submission to treat it as withdrawn. The applicant was directed to surrender before the lower court within four weeks, and the regular bail application filed thereafter would be decided in light of the Supreme Court guidelines in…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4176 OF 2012 Dr. Sangita w/o. Nitin Dhakne .. Applicant Age.45 years, Occ. Medical Practitioner, [original R/o. Ganesh Par, Parli Vaijinath, accused] Tq.

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 425/2020 Manohar Singh S/o Prithivi Singh Rajput, Aged About 25 Years, Padla Hadliya Police Thana, Sagwada, District Dungarpur. (At Present Lodged At Dist