Disposed

Pankaj v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC9 Nov 2022ABAIL/10612/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by accepting the counsel's submission to treat it as withdrawn. The applicant was directed to surrender before the lower court within four weeks, and the regular bail application filed thereafter would be decided in light of the Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Application treated as withdrawn; liberty granted to file regular bail; applicant directed to surrender within four weeks.

Pankaj Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10612 of 2022 Applicant :- Pankaj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for applicant and Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned A.G.A. for State .

¶5

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 304 of 2022, under sections 4/18/23/29 Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994, Section 3B/9/10 PreConception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994 and Section 120-B, 34 I.P.C., P.S. Mandi Dhanaura, district Amroha.

¶6

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶9

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant- Pankaj in the above case.

¶10

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶11

Order Date :- 9.11.2022 Shalini

¶12

Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.11.10 13:32:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pankaj v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Yashpal Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Shakuntala Vs State of U.P and Another

Neeraj Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Udhan Singh Saini and Another Vs State of U.P.

Deepak Agrawal Vs State of U.P.