The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner was subsequently selected and appointed on the post of A.N.M., redressing the original grievance.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS No.1688 of 2016 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Alok Mahra, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sushil Vashisth, learned Standing Counsel along with Mr. Bhupendra Koranga, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Supplementary affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. Misc. application (IA No.10862/2023) stands disposed of accordingly. 5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has sought appointment on the post of A.N.M. (Female) on the basis of the advertisement, in which, she has not been permitted to participate for the reason that she was not enrolled in any of the employment exchange of the State. But, in a subsequent advertisement issued on 15.03.2022, petitioner is selected and appointed on the post of A.N.M. (Female) vide order dated 13.03.2023. 6. This fact has been substantiated by learned State Counsel in paragraph nos.5 & 6 in its supplementary affidavit. 7. In view of this new development, the writ petition has become infructuous as the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.12.2023 AK |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition concerning appointment to A.N.M. post remains maintainable after subsequent selection.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous given the resolution of the petitioner's grievance.
Petitioner
State
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
