Single judge permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition replacing it with a challenge to a rejection order on compassionate appointment, dismissing the current petition with liberty to file afresh.
Withdrawal permitted. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS No.2167 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Himanshu Aswal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition for the reason that the representation which was preferred by the petitioner for compassionate appointment has already been rejected and now the rejection order needs to be challenged. 4. In this view of the matter the permission is granted. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh. |
|||
| (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01.12.2023 SK |
Petitioner
State
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
