The writ petitions seeking directions to hold elections for District Cooperative Bank delegates were dismissed as infructuous because the elections had already been held after their filing, making the claimed relief obsolete.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 1427 of 2018 WPMS No. 1430 of 2018 WPMS No. 1432 of 2018 WPMS No. 1435 of 2018 WPMS No. 1437 of 2018 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|||
| There is no representation for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for Cooperative Election Authority, Uttarakhand. These writ petitions were filed in the year 2018 seeking a direction to Uttarakhand Cooperative Election Authority to conduct elections of Delegates of District Cooperative Bank in State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel appearing for Cooperative Election Authority, Uttarakhand makes a statement at the bar that, subsequent to filing of these writ petitions, elections of Delegates of District Cooperative Bank were held and term of the Delegates is about to come an end. Since the only relief was to hold elections and the elections have already been held, therefore, the relief, as claimed in these writ petitions, does not survive. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 03.03.2023 Arpan |
WPMS No. 1427 of 2018
State of Uttarakhand
Cooperative Election Authority, Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
