Allowed bail application of Dinesh Tamta charged with murder. Court held case fit for bail despite recovery of iron rod, noting lack of forensic evidence and circumstantial nature of case. Ordered personal bond and two sureties.
Enlarged on bail on personal bond and two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 38 of 2023
Dinesh Tamta
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
Present:-
….….Respondent Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Dinesh Tamta is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 310 of 2022 dated 03.08.2022, under Sections 302, 364, 201 IPC, P.S. Ramnagar, District Nainital. He has sought his released on bail.
2
Avneet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves bail given the allegations of murder and recovery of a weapon without forensic examination.
Dinesh Tamta
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
