The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed a bail application against the State, holding the case fit for bail and releasing the applicant on a personal bond with sureties in an FIR involving alleged cheating over a mortgaged property.
Applicant allowed to be enlarged on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 232 of 2023
Smt. Vanmala Agrawal
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.P.S. Mer, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Smt. Vanmala Agrawal is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 64 of 2022 dated 23.01.2022, under Sections 420/120B/465 IPC, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar. She has sought her release on bail.
2
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 03.04.2023
Avneet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail in a case under Sections 420/120B/465 IPC alleging cheating for concealing a mortgage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Vanmala Agrawal
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
