OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail…
Applicant released on bail, executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 105 of 2023
Smt. Urmila ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Ranjan Ghildiyal, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Counter Affidavit is taken on record. Delay Condonation Application (IA No.1 of 2023) stands disposed of, accordingly.
2
accused Faizan. Therefore, they together killed the deceased.
are call detail records against the applicant.
8. The bail application is allowed.
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 05.04.2023
Ravi Bisht
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Delhi High Court erred in admitting a declaration regarding maternity benefits under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
Smt. Urmila
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
