Single judge oral order allowing anticipatory bail to the applicant in an FIR regarding alleged rape, subject to standard conditions.
Application allowed; bail subject to furnishing bond with sureties and complying with specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No.7 of 2023
Jahid Hasan
...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 1109 of 2022, under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.
2
3
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 05.04.2023
Jitendra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for grant of anticipatory bail in a case under Section 376 IPC.
Jahid Hasan
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
