Pramod Kumar Chauhan v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS No.2659 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|||
| Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. |
|||
| Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Addl. C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. |
|||
| Petitioner is an employee of |
|||
| agricultural department serving as |
|||
| Assistant Agricultural Officer. Vide | |||
| order dated 20.11.2019, he was |
|||
| transferred from Bahadarabad |
|||
| (Haridwar) to Pithoragarh on administrative ground against a vacant post. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the said transfer order dated 20.11.2019. A Coordinate Bench of this Court passed an interim order on 04.12.2019, whereby, effect and operation of the transfer order was stayed. On strength of the stay order, petitioner is still continuing at Bahadarabad (Haridwar). A period of nearly three years have |
|||
| elapsed since the interim order was |
| passed and earlier also, petitioner |
|---|
| served at Bahadarabad for considerable |
| period of time, therefore, no |
| interference with the impugned transfer order can be made at this belated |
| stage. Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate |
| holding brief of Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, |
| Advocate for the petitioner submits that at the time of filing of the writ petition, petitioner was 57 years of age, as |
mentioned in the affidavit, therefore, he |
| would have attained the age of |
| superannuation. |
| Be that as it may. Having regard |
| to the aforesaid facts and reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. Interim order stands vacated. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 08.07.2022 Ravi |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer of Assistant Agricultural Officer to a vacant post against his will could be interfered with at this belated stage.
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court