Allowed
Madan Mohan Pandey v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others
Uttarakhand HCWPSS/2377/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS No.2377 of 2015 With WPSS No.2378 of 2015 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. Imraz Rautela, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. V.S. Rathore, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for respondent no.4. In the order passed by this Court in these two connected matters on 01.08.2022 the reference of the office memorandum which has been made is that of**“20.09.2022”that has been sought to be corrected as“29.06.2022”.** The said correction is permitted. Accordingly, the Correction Application Nos.5780 of 2022 and 5779 of 2022 would stand allowed. The order passed today will constitute as to be the part of the order dated 01.08.2022. (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 13.09.2022 Arti |
Petitioners
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent no.4
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court