Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after police filed chargesheet against the petitioner. Interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| W PCRL 1 1 1 4 / 2 0 2 1 Hon’ble N.S. Dh an ik , J. |
|||
| Km. Meenu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Panwar, Brief Holder, for the State. |
|||
| Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, police has filed chargesheet against the petitioner. |
|||
| In view of the above, this writ petition has rendered infructuous and it is dismissed as such. |
|||
| Interim order, if any, stands vacated. ( N.S. Dh an ik , J.) 5 .8 .2 0 2 1 Pr |
Km. Meenu
State
N.S. Dhanik
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
