further submitted that the door of the room, in which the deceased committed suicide by hanging herself with the fan, was bolted from inside and when the alarm was raised by the child (son of the deceased) from inside the room, the applicants saw the scene from the window. Learned Senior Counsel argued that one Mr. Haseeb, a common relative of both sides who reached at the place of occurrence immediately after the incident, is a key witness but his name does not figure in the list of witnesses. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the deceased had illicit relations with one unknown person, to whom she made more than 8000 calls in short span of time and talked to him in the night of 3.7.2020 and even in the morning of 4.7.2020 and the same is apparent from the call record details of the mobile phone of the deceased and when the said person refused to marry her, she committed suicide, but this aspect has not been investigated by the police. Learned Senior Counsel further argued that it has also come to light during investigation that the deceased was not sexually satisfied with her husband. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court rendered in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal , 1992 AIR 604 , and argued
