Allowed

Kuldeep Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC5 Aug 2021BA1/90/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge allowed the bail application of an incarcerated applicant slapped with non-cognizable, bailable offences triable by a Magistrate. The court was influenced by the duration of detention and declined to adjudicate the merits, ordering release on personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail on a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned.

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Uttarakhand — Bail and Remand | Uttarakhand HC (2021)

¶1

SL. No	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
			BA1 9 0 / 2 0 2 0 Hon’ble N.S. Dh an ik , J.
			Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant.
			Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder, for the State.
			Applicant is in jail in connection
			with FIR No. 412/ 2019, under Sections 379, 411, 420 IPC, PS Bazpur, District
			Udham Singh Nagar. Hence, the present bail application has been moved.
			Learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has been falsely implicated; that initially the FIR was registered against unknown person; that
			there is no independent witness of the
			alleged recovery of car; that all the offences are triable by Magistrate; and that the applicant is in jail since 21.11.2019.
			Learned State Counsel would
			contend that the recovery has been made
			from the applicant and there is CCTV
			footage of the recovery as well and 12
			more cases are pending against the

¶2

applicant, out	of	which 10 cases are of
similar nature. Learne would submit	d C tha	ounsel for the applicant t the applicant has been
granted bail in Having	all he	other 12 cases. ard learned Counsel for
the parties,	con	sidering the facts and
circumstances	of	the case and particularly
the period of	det	ention, and without any
comment on	the	merits of the case, the
Court is of t	he	view that the applicant
deserves bail the bail applic Let the on his executi	at atio ap ng	this stage. Consequently, n is allowed. plicant be released on bail a personal bond and two
sureties, each	in	the like amount, to the
satisfaction of Pr	Ma	gistrate/ Court concerned. ( N.S. Dh an ik , J.) 5 .8 .2 0 2 1

Kuldeep Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaheena Vs State of Uttarakhand

Sudhir Kumar Verma Vs State of Uttarkahand

Manju Negi Vs State of Uttarakhand

Amreen Jahan Vs State of Uttarakhand

Ahsan Ali Vs State of Uttarakhand

Sukhdev Singh Alias Sukkha Vs State of Uttarakhand