Dismissed
Radhey Shyam Sharma v. Abhishek Rohilla
Uttarakhand HCCLCON/181/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLCON No. 181 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|||
| Mr. J.C. Karnatak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at the bar that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with. |
|||
| I n such view of the matter, contempt petition is closed. Contempt notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 16.11.2021 Shubham |
`
Petitioner
Respondent
Manoj Kumar Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court