In SL. No. CLCON 155 of 2019, the单 Punjab and Haryana High Court closed a contempt petition upon a statement by the petitioner's counsel that the impugned order of the Writ Court had been complied with, discharging the contempt notice issued to the respondent no.1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLCON No. 155 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Ms. Sudha Tamta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at the bar that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with. |
|||
| I n such view of the matter, contempt petition is closed. Contempt notice issued to the respondent no.1 is hereby discharged. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 16.11.2021 Shubham |
`
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed given the compliance statement by the petitioner's counsel.
Petitioner
Respondent no.1
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
