Dismissed
Mohan Singh Rathore v. Annad Verdhan
Uttarakhand HCCLCON/13/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No. 13 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, |
J. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Dinesh Chandra |
Gahtori, | |||
| Advocate for the petitioner. | ||||
| Mr. H.M. Raturi, Deputy General for the State of Uttarakh Heard learned counsel parties. Learned Deputy Advocate appearing for the respondents that against the order passed Court, a Special Appeal has bee the State, which has been admitt pending. Since the order, contempt has been alleged has not become is subject matter of Appeal, ther Contempt petition is closed with the petitioner to file afresh, as a the Appeal is decided in his favou Contempt notices issued respondents are hereby discharge ( Man oj Ku m ar Ti 15.11.2021 Navin |
Advocate and. for the General submits by Writ n filed by ed and is whereof final and efore, the liberty to nd when r. to the d. w ar i, J.) |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Special Appeal filed against a contempt order became sub judice and made the contempt proceedings maintainable.
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
State of Uttarakh
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court