A contempt petition was disposed of as the petitioner's counsel stated at the bar that the order of the Writ Court was complied with. The court discharged the contempt notices issued to the respondents and closed the petition. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Contempt notices discharged; petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLCON No. 121 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Mahavir Prasad Kohli, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harendra Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at the bar that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with. |
|||
| I n such view of the matter, contempt petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 16.11.2021 Shubham |
`
Petitioner
State
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
