had already expressed his mind by writing the letter dated 30.7.2012, to the Commission, that the petitioner did not have the requisite experience; this letter was based on the first report of the Enquiry Officer which, in any case, was inconclusive; the impugned order clearly showed that the Commission had relied on the letter of the Additional Secretary in concluding that the petitioner did not have the prescribed qualifications and had, therefore, cancelled his candidature; the main enquiry report was not examined either by the State Government or by the Public Service Commission while passing the impugned order; the only conclusion which could, therefore, be drawn was that the petitioner was selected by the Public Service Commission to the post of Assistant Registrar; and, after being duly selected, his candidature was cancelled without taking cognizance of the enquiry report dated 8.11.2012, which had recorded a conclusive finding that the petitioner was eligible and had all the qualifications to be appointed to the post of Assistant Registrar, and his certificates were in order. The Writ Petition was allowed. The impugned order dated 8.11.2012 was quashed, and the respondents were directed to forthwith give appointment to the petitioner in the post of Assistant Registrar.
