The High Court of Uttarakhand condoned a 53-day delay in filing a Special Appeal and allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a review before the Single Judge.
Liberty to file a review application before the learned Single Judge was granted; the Special Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Delay Condonation Application No. 9505 of 2018
In
Special Appeal No. 524 of 2018
Mukesh Kumar ...Appellant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents
Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the appellant.
Mrs. Prabha Naithani, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhandrespondents 1 to 4.
Dated: 14th May, 2019
Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)
Delay of 53 days in preferring this appeal is not opposed by Mrs. Prabha Naithani, learned Brief Holder for the State Government and the delay is, therefore, condoned.
(N.S. Dhanik, J.) (Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.) 14.05.2019 14.05.2019
Rahul
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 53 days in preferring the appeal can be condoned.
Whether the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a review.
Mukesh Kumar
State of Uttarakhand
Ramesh Ranganathan
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
