The High Court of Uttarakhand, at Nainital, condoned a 56-day delay in filing a special appeal and disposed of the matter by adhering to a previous Division Bench order, granting no separate costs.
The appeal was disposed of following the order in Special Appeal Nos. 384 and 385 of 2017 dated 13.02.2019; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Special Appeal No. 386 of 2017
With
Delay Condonation Application No. 7500 of 2017
Director, Primary Education and others ...Appellants
Vs.
Dharamveer Singh ...Respondent
Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the appellants-State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. T.C. Pande, learned counsel for the respondent-writ petitioner.
Dated: 13th May, 2019
Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)
The delay of 56 days in preferring this appeal is not opposed by Mr. T.C. Pande, learned counsel for the respondent-writ petitioner and the delay is, therefore, condoned.
(N.S. Dhanik, J.) (Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.) 13.05.2019 13.05.2019 Rahul
Director, Primary Education
Dharamveer Singh
Ramesh Ranganathan
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
