The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of an application to condone delay in filing a special appeal. The court noted the subject matter was already covered by a previous order from the same bench and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Application to condone delay disposed of; Special Appeal dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 297 of 2019 With
Delay Condonation Application No.4563 of 2019
State of Uttarakhand & others …….Appellants Versus
Manmohan Singh & others …….Respondents
Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State/appellants. Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate for the respondents-writ petitioners.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Dated: 13th May, 2019
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, C.J. (Oral)
Application to condone the delay in preferring the appeal is not opposed by Mr. Anil Anthwal, learned counsel for the respondents-writ petitioners and the delay is, therefore, condoned. Delay Condonation Application stands disposed of.
NISHANT
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the special appeal should be condoned.
Whether the present appeal requires independent adjudication given a recent order from the same bench.
State of Uttarakhand & others
Manmohan Singh & others
Ramesh Ranganathan
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
