Writ petition for regularization of services in Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners' services were regularized during the pendency of the petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No. 635 of 2014
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, present for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, learned counsel for the respondent.
In the present writ petition, the petitioners claim regularization in Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan. During the pendency of writ petition, the services of the petitioners have been regularized.
Learned counsel for the petitioners now states that the writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 18.11.2014
Aswal
Petitioners
Respondent
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
