Court dismissed PIL seeking ban on religious pictures on commodity wrappers, holding no public interest exists and victim should file criminal complaint under IPC 295/295A.
Writ petition dismissed in limine without interference by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (PIL) No.180 of 2014
Lalit Miglani ………….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ……..Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral)
2
(U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 17.11.2014 17.11.2014
ML
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere by directing a ban on religious pictures on commodity covers causing public sentiment injury.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalit Miglani
State of Uttarakhand
Sudhanshu Dhulia
U.C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
