Petitioner Constable challenged an adverse service entry for picketing fruit without payment. The single-judge bench found no anomaly in the process and dismissed the petition in limine without citing statutes or precedents.
Writ petition dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 2009 of 2014
Mohd. Jafar … Petitioner Vs
State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents
Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Pandey, Brief Holder, present for the State/respondents.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral)
2
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
03.12.2014
Aswal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the recording of an 'Adverse Entry' in the petitioner's service book alleging misconduct.
Mohd. Jafar
State of Uttarakhand
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
