Court dismissed contempt petition after respondents admitted compliance with challenged order dated 31.07.2013. Notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CLCON No. 398 of 2013
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate, present for the petitioner.
Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate, present for the respondents.
A statement has been made at bar by Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents that the order dated 31.07.2013 passed in WPSS No. 949 of 2012 (of which will disobedience has been alleged) has now been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted this fact.
In view of the above admitted position, the contempt petition is dismissed.
Notices are hereby discharged.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
06.03.2014
Aswal
Petitioner
Respondents
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
