Rakesh v. State Of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. Deep…
of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. Deep…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA2 No. 41 of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.
Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Hari Om Bhakuni, Brief Holder for the State.
Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant having argued for sometime, seeks permission to withdraw this 2nd Bail Application too. He, however, states that Trial Court be directed to expedite the trial.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Trial Court is requested to explore every possibility to expedite the trial and further requested not to grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
(Alok Singh, J.)
Dated 24.05.2013 Shiv
Applicant
State
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court