Writ petition sought mandamus directing the police to file a final report and take cognizance in Crime No.182 of 2014. The court was informed that investigation was complete and a charge sheet filed with cognizance taken. Holding no cause survived, it dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3486 I
I I I I I i ! I 1 ;
IN TI-IE +IIGH COI'RT FOR TI{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, TI'E FOI.JRTH DAY OF SEPTEIT,IBER TWO THOUSAND AT{D T\A'ENTY FIVE
Eil=Fl=ilfi
THE HONOT'RABLE SRt JT.ISTICE VAKITIRAT/IAI(RISHNA REDDY
Between:
M/s M.R. Logistics, fep.by its Manager, S.N. Chatterjee, S/o. N.C. Chatterjee, aged about - 58 years, Occ: busines-s, Rlo. 1-744 Road tlo.11, chaitanyapuri, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or dkection more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of'Respondent No.3 in not filing final report for taking cognizance of offerrce in Crime No.182 ol 2o14 dt.24-04-2014 on the file Chaitanyapuri Police, Cyberabad as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to anest and file final report for taking cognizance of offence in Crime No.182 of 2014 dt.24-o1-2014 onthefile of Respondent No. 3.
l.A- NO: 1OF 2O1 . NO: 50997 OF 2O{5)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cotrrt may be pleased to direct the Respondent no. 3 to arrest accused and any suspected for conducing investigation and filing final report to take cognizance of offence in Crime No.182 of 2014 dt.24-04-2014 on the file Chaitanyapur Police pending disposal of the writ petition before this Hon'ble court.
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI SUDARSHATI MALUGARI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SRIDHAR BHUVANAGIR, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
1t I I
IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICT VAIgTI RAMAIIRISHilA REDDY
IPRIT PECIflOil !Io.39538 of 2O15
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Home.
t
t
d--
2
VRKR, J wp_39536_2015
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if arry,
shall stand closed.
I
tI
<br>OFFICER
<br>
//TRUE COPY//
To, 1. One CC to Sri Sudarshan Malugari, Advocate [OFUC]
TJ PMK
I
HIGH GOURT
0 4t09t202s
3 E
WP.No.39538 of 2015
t
''.I(.
oo t oZ
SPA.r
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
b
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police failure to file a final report in Crime No.182 of 2014 warranted a writ of mandamus.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s M.R. Logistics, rep. by its Manager, S.N. Chatterjee
The State of Telangana, rep. Secretary, Department of Home
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate
The Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri Police Station
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
