Writ petition challenging police inaction and arrest was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner appeared neither in person nor through counsel despite multiple listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3486 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDOY
WRIT PETITION NO: 3811 1 OF 2013
Between:
Beeram lndira Reddy, W/o Bhaskar Reddy Aged about 36 Yrs, Occ Business R/o Plot No.546, Phase-|, Bhagat Sing Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring in action of the 3rd respondent in not investigating into the case and arrest the 4th respondent in Crime No.645/2013 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondent to investigate into the case in Crime No.645/2013 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad and file final report.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 201 P. NO: 47393 OF 20{31
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the writpetition, the High Court may bepleasedto direct the 3rd respondent to complete the investigation and file final reportin
Crime No.645 of 2013 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents No.4 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
a (
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAISTI RAMAI(RISHNA REDDY
WRIT PEIITION No.38111 of 2013
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even on earlier occasions i.e., on 16.08.2023,26.08-2025 and 29.08.2025,therewas no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Though, ttre matterwas listed today i.e., on 03.O9.2025 under the caption "For Dismissal"as a last chance to the petitioner, none appeared on behalf ofthe petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not having any inclination to prosecute this case, as such, this Court has no other optionexcept to dismiss tJ:e Writ Petition for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. L.VIJAY ASS ./TRUE COPY// ECTIONOFFICERREEDY' AdAd loPUCl ngana. touTl
To, 1. OneCC to SRI T'PRADYUMNA KUMAR REEDY' AdAd 2.TwoCCstoGPFORHOME'HighCourtforthestateofTela 3. TwoCD CoPies. BSK GJP Pr^q.
A /
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/0912025
ORDER
WP.No.381 11 of 2013
iHI. S 'rA
o :7
a 7 JAil 2U28 :Z
'tt
&'ri'Cil'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
@*
r:-lu-lr{
Beeram Indira Reddy
Commissioner of police, Hyderabad
Assistant Commissioner of Police, Banjara Hills
Narra Krishna Rao
Vakti Ramakrishna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
