P. Kalyan Ram v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE S-T.ATE OF…
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE S-T.ATE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3486 ]
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE S-T.ATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRDDAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THEHoNoURABLESRIJUSTICEVAKITIRAMAKRISHNAREDDY
Between:
...'ET'T'ONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High court maybe pleasedtoissuedwrit,orderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof writ of Mandamus,declaring the action of the respondentNo'1 in initiating the proceedings inPRC No.1 1 of 2015 on the file of the lV Additional chief MetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabadarising out of crime No'188/2014 registered by sHo,NatlakuntaPolice station, Hyderabadis illegal' arbitrary' vindictive and viorative ofArticres 1g and 21 0r constitutionof rndia and consequential order directingthe respondent No.1 to drop all further proceedings in PRC No'11 of 2ols.onthefileofthelVAdditionalChiefMetropolitanMagistrate,Hyderabad arising outof crime No.188/2014 registeredby sHo, NallakuntaPolice station' Hyderabad
roF
petition under Section 151cpc praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of allfurther proceedings in PRCNo'11 of 2015 on the file of the lV Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate'Hyderabadarising out of CrimeNo 188/2014 registeredby SHO, NallakuntaPolice Station' Hyderabadincluding arrest of petitionerspending disposal of the above writ petitionand to passsuch other order or orders asthis Hon'ble Court rnSy deems fit iust and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counselfor the Petitioners:SRIJ. V. S' H' SASTRY
No. I &2: SRISRIDHARBHUVANAGIRI'AGP FOR Counsel forthe HOME(TG)
Counselfor theRespondent No. 3: S SURENDER REDDY
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
\ \
\
THE HONOI'RABLE SRI JUSTICEVAISTI RAMAITRISHNA REDDY WRIT PEIITION No.21843of 2O15
ORDER:
Heard sri sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learnedAssistantGovernment Pleader for Home appearing for respondentNos.l and 2 and Sri S.surender Reddy, learned counsel forrespondentNo.3. However, there is no representation on behatfof the petitioners.
2
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand ckrsed.
SD'.M. JAWAHARREDDY STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC 1:o SRI J V S H SASTRY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. iio Cc. to Gp FoRHoME(TG), High Court for the State of Telangana' IOUTI
g. bne CC ro SRt S. SURENDER REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
MMT BS
I /
HIGH COIJRT
DATED:0310912025
t .ri tt'ti s - r:t- -
o
C) 2 0 r[8 2026 z
* *
ORDER
WP.No.21843of 2015
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
I \a,b
+
1 issue framed by the court
Should proceedings in PRC No.11 of 2015 arising out of Crime No.188/2014 be declared illegal and further proceedings dropped?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
I.P.Kalyan Ram
P.J.Chandraiah
(Third petitioner, name partially illegible)
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department
The Station House Officer, Nallakunta Police Station, Hyderabad
(Respondent No.3, name partially illegible)
Vakiti Rama Krishna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court