The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution, who sought a direction to update service records and forward retirement pension proposals.
Permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition as prayed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 32122 OF 2024
Between:
Ir/edi lMallaiah, S/o Bhumaiah Age.61yrs Occ. JuniorAssistant,R/o. SRT Q.No.5, lB Banglow Area, Utnoor, Adilabad District
,.. .,.PETITIONER AND {
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction moreparticularly onein the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that thedeclaringthat the action of the Respondent no 4 and 5 in not updating my serviceregister and not forwardingthe pensron proposals of the petitioner to the Respondent No 6office since the petitioner is due for retirement on superaflnuation on31-05-2025is illegal, arbitrary and violate ofprinciples ofnatural justice and also againstArticle 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect the Respondentno 4 and 5 to sanction to forward thepension proposalsof the petitionerto the Respondent no 6 by duly updating the serviceregister of the petitioner due for retirement on 31-O5-2O25.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s P.LALITHAKAMESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.lTO 5: GP FORSERVICES-I Counsel for the Respondent No.6:SRI K.BALA KRISHNA,SC FOR AG The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HO]IT'BLE SRI JUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.32122 OF 2024
ORDER:
Ms.P.Lalitha Kamesh, learned counselfor the petitioner, on has addresserl a letter to theRegistrar(Judi,:ial) 22.O1.2025, s;eeking permissionof this Courtto withdraw the present Writ Pt:tition with a liberty tofrle freshWrdt Petition
Miscella.r eous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
*SD7- A:SRINIVASA EDDY ASSISTANTREG TRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTIONOFFICER
PSK. crP a4(L
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410112025
ORDER
WP.No.32122 of 2024
E C)
.:) ' 7
c
[ 4 if,r,i\ 2825 .b
5 -i'
I
I), :r-i C?\ +9
DISMISSING I'HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRA\A/N WITHOUT COSTS
@{,",
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Article 226 of the ConstitutionReferred¶18
Ir/edi lMallaiah
State of Telangana
District Collector, Adilabad District
Sub-Collector, Utnoor
Tahsildar, Gadiguda mandal
Deputy Tahsildar, Gadiguda
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
