A contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of an order directing the Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within six weeks. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the underlying order had been complied with, and the court accordingly closed the contempt case without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[330, ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR Ar HYDr#lBlfrEoF TELANGANA
FRIDAY,THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWo THoUSAND AND rwerrrri rrVr'"^,.,
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2076 0F 2024
petition under Section. ,:,1"_12of .Contemptof Courts Act, to punish the respondenr for wiltfut disobedience or tne oruers"iri;"r;TX ;:,; :"^^l:1i:h .f Hon,bte Court in WF ruo_1?ora of 2022 ) 12_06_2024 passed by thrs
Between:
K Buchaiah' sio Mallaiah Aged 48 -years, Lecturer in Botany and princioar (FAC), Government Degree c6rrege, dnr-irirl'r,rirr]i J,.,r,",, r a ..dnr-irirl'r,rirr]i J,.,r,",, r a ..J,.,r,",, r a ..r a ..a ....
(FAC), Government Degree c6rrege, dnr-irirl'r,rirr]i J,.,r,",, r a ..dnr-irirl'r,rirr]i J,.,r,",, r a ..J,.,r,",, r a ..r a ..a ....
AND
...PETtTIONER
Sri B Venkatesham, IAS l.:rgt1q to Government , HighdlEducation Deparrment Tetangana Secretariat,'Hyd;r;;;"'",'.,,,,
...REPONDENT
counsel for the petitioner :SRl GADDAM SETHU MADHAVA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent : Gp FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLESRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK coNTE MPTCASENo.2 076 OF2o24
ORDER:
ThisContempl(lase' unrlerSeclions 10 to12 of the ContemPto[ CourtsAct. 197 fis lilccl seekingto punish the respondent lbr u'illful and deliberateviolation ol the order' datert 12 06 2O24 passed llv this Courtin W.P.No.46tr18 of '2O2''!
2 ThisCourt't,,t.Jr, rlrder dated 12-06.2024in W.P.No.466]18 ot 2022, e firstrespondcnLtherern to dispose of the appealhled bv the directedth on 10.O5.2022,in accordance u'ith larv' within a period of six petitloner weeks.
Iearnedcounselfor 3. Todav when tht'ln:rtteris taken ttp for heartng' P.No.46618of J the petionersubmits that the order dated 12'06'2024 in \U 2022is comPlied
4 Havingregard ro the ab()'(lmadesubmission, the ContemptCasets closed
Pentlingmiscellaneouspetitions' ilany; shall stand closedNo
sd,-B. s ATYAVATHI REGISTRAR ./ DEPUTY I / //TRUECOPY'/ 'secrtoNoFFlcER
COSTS
\
To,
l?;i33ji"%i?t?'3$i''Ji"Y+?ISXfrT:;3t1li'i5't'""''"'31." tourl J, iwo CDCoPtes 6 AR/gh
:?-
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410112025
ORDER
CC.No.2076 of 2O24
.-4='
lF"t
S I.. ,F a,
q (
'5
..
o fl ,..,',r 2[25 C
+'
t
055;;n-rt-'rii
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent wilfully disobeyed the court's order dated 12-06-2024 in W.P.No.46618 of 2022 directing disposal of the petitioner's appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K Buchaiah
Sri B Venkatesham
PULLA KARTHIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
