Petitioners sought quashing of FIR under Sections 323, 447, 427, 506 r/w 34 IPC. Investigation was completed and a final report filed as C.C.No.1134 of 2024; the court held no cause survived and closed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEN/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 26518 OF 2022
Between:
6- Kongara Saida Rao, S/o. Appa Rao, Aged about 38years, Occ.Business, Rl/o. H.No. 4-5-656, Plot No. B-83, Kamalanagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad - 500070.
...PETITIONERS
AND
7, K. Ratnalucky Kumar, S/o. Vijay Kumar, aged 26 years, Occ. Watchman, R/o. [/adhapur, Cyberabad, Telangana.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVANDAMUS by quash the FIR in Crime No. 557 of 2022
,-
on the file of sth respondent registered under section 323,4 i , 427, 506 rlw 34 oi IPC as illegal, arbitrary and violatrve of Art. 14. 19 and21 the Constitution of lndia consequently direct the respondentpolice not to haras the petitioners
lA NO:'l OF 2022
Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the ci - .rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Cou may bepieased to direct the respondent nc. 2 and 3 to conduct enquiry and1 ll.e necessary action against the respondent 6 and 7 for their activities in the mz'i :r of registering the FIR in Crime No. 557 of 2022 on the file of 5th responl'q, rt registered under section 323, 447,427,506 r/w 34 of IPC
lA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci rrmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m r;' be pleased to stay all further proceedings in connection with FIR in Crime No. : I ' of 2022 on the file of 5th respondent registered under section 323, 447, 421 506 r/w 34 of IPC including a rrest/a ppea ra nce of petitioners, pending disposal ,f the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SHERI PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to5: SRI B. SRIDHAR, A 3P FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6&7:--
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICEJ. SREENfVASRAO WRIT PETITION No.26518of2022
ORDER:
This Writ Petitionhas been liled by the petitioners seeking toquash the proceedingsagainstthe petitioners who were arrayedas accusedin Crime No.557of 2022 on the file of Madhapur (Guttala)Police Station, Cyberabad,wherein the for the offences punishableunder Sections323, 447' 427, 506 read with 34 of the IndianPenal Code, 1860.
I I
' lzora;s scczzt
k.*e.
2
I
as C.C.No.1134 ,cf 2024 on the fiie of X Adc .iona-l JFCM, Kukatpally.
in the present writ petition. There shall be no orde -as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, ,.;ha_11 stand
closed.
::,D/- MOHD. ISMAIL t),,.\ [IE:PUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
riEcTtoN oFFlcER
To,
BM
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510912025
'i itl zffi li
L
. ,.7
ORDER
WP.No.26518 of 2022
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WTTHOIJTCOSTS
rltolr-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR in Crime No. 557 of 2022 registered under Sections 323, 447, 427, 506 r/w 34 IPC should be quashed
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of BiharReferred
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
4 provisions across 4 enactments
K. Seethapathi Rao and 5 others
K. Satyanarayana Rao
Nomula Anji Reddy
Yatam Murali
Epuri Veera Venkata Narayana
Kongara Saida Rao
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
