Ayinampudi Annapurna, Vs the State of Telangana

1 AYINAMPUDI ANNAPURNA, Wo A. Satyanaruyana Raju, aged about 67 Yrs., _Occ: Housewife, No 1 0-3-291 I 1 tH,' Vijay ilagar Citrbny:^-iyt"irOrO- 500057.

¶10

2 PENMETSA VASANTHA LAXMI, W/o p,Bangar Raju, aged about 50 yrs., Occ: H.ousewife, Fyo Mog_qqlu,^palakoderu M-andal,'Wesi Godavari disiri;i: Presently. residing at 4525 Ellen Way, Union City, Califomia g45g7. Represented by her father and authorised person Ayinanipudi Satvanaravana HaJU, aged aboul T2 years, Rl/O yousufquda. Hvderibad.

¶11

3 CHAGARLAMUDT CHANDRAMMA, Wb CH.S'riramulu, aged about 67 yrs., O-c-c: Housewife, R/o Plot No.2l,Venkateshwara Nagar, nlderpei, ftiOeraOaOl 500040.

¶12

4 K.RADHA, Wo K.Sudhakar_Babu, aged about 66 yrs, Occ: Housewife, R/o. qh!_V_eI[qleshwaraNagar,Meerpet,-Hyderabad-500040.

¶13

G.SEETHAMAHALAKSHMT, W/o.G-Rama Krishnam Raju, aged about 67 Y.rs.,. .O.cc: _Housewife, .Rl/o- Mandataparru Viflagrj,^' iiaepiillguij", Mandal,West Godavari District, Andra pradeish.

¶14

6 P.ANASUYA,,W/o P.Sita Rama Raju, aged about 64 yrs., Occ: Housewife, Rl/ o Mandalaparru Vittage, Tadepaitigudrem Mandat,West eooavali-oiliict, Andra Pradesh.

¶15

..PETITIONERS

¶16

AND

¶17

THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Represented by its principal Secretary Home -^{Department, T.S. Secretariat,Hyderabad.} 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF pOLiCE, Rachakonda Commissionerate. Ooo.

¶18

^{IvlalkajgiriCourt Complex, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad.}

¶19

1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, RAChAKONdA

¶20

. 9.qlqtSltp.qrg!9.^{P._S.[yq[qigLrda, ECtLX Roacjs, Hyderabad.}

¶21

1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, p.S. Keesara, Keesara Main Road, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶22

K. MADHAVA RAO,S/o. Late Batakrishna Rao, aged about 77 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o.H.No.'12-13-245, Street No.15, Tam'aka, Secundrirabail -^-' 500007.

¶23

a

¶24

K. ARUNA IUMARI, Wio.K. Madhava Rao, aged about 70 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.H.NO.'1 2-1 3-245, Street No.1 5, Tamaka, S6cunO'eraOiO - 500007.

¶25

...RESPONDENTS

¶26

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶27

pleased to ISSUE a Writ of Mandamus or any other appr rpriate Writ or Writs, Order or Orders questioning the action of Responder ts more particularly Respondent Nos.3 & 4 in registering FIR dated 19.OS.2O23,rith FtR No.340/2023 under sections 447, 427, 341 , Rl/w. 34 IPC on the^,i : of p.S. Keesara, Rachakonda despite there being lnjunction to the Petitionen; n 1.A.No.397 of 2O2Z in O.S.No.2138 ot 2022 on the file of Honble I Additionrr Senior Civil Judge, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Malkajgiri as Arbitrary, lllegal, L njust and violative of principles of Natural Justice and consequenily to euash the I lR dated 19.05.2023 with FIR No.340/2023 under sections 447, 427,341 , RIw. . 4 lpC on the fite of P.S.Keesara, Rachakonda.

¶28

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶29

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the ci-r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of ihe petition, the High court m l be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to FIR dated 19.0s.2o23 a th FIR No.340/2023 under sections 447 , 427 ,341 , R/w. 34 IPC on the file of p.S.l( resara, Rachakonda including the arrest of the Petitioners. i

¶30

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GOVARDHAN REDDY JOUt DLA

¶31

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

{ (

¶34

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO

¶35

WRIT PETITION No.25516 of 2o23

¶36

ORDER:

¶37

This writ petition has been frled by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR.No.34O of 2023 on the file of the Keesara Police Station, Rachakonda, wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos. 1 to 6 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 347 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, despite there being injunction order granted by the competent civil Court in I.A.No.397 of 2022 in O.S.No.2138 of 2022 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri.

¶38

Heard J.Govardhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners ald B.Sridhar, learned Assistalt Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of the offrcial respondents.

¶39

During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that during the pendency of ttre writ petition, the Investigation Officer, after conducting the investigation, Iiled hna-l report^before the III Judicial First Class Magistrate, Malkajgiri, and the^said

¶40

2

¶41

Magistrate taken cognizance and the same wa:, numbered as

¶42

-^</sup>

¶43

C.C.No.192O of 2023 and the same is pending cor sideration.

¶44

In view of the above submissions, the canr re in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

¶45

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. Hovr ver, liberty is grarted to the petitioners to raise a_ll the groun ls which are available under law, including the grounds whirl are pleaded in the present writ petition. There shall be no orde - as to costs.

¶46

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

¶47

closed

¶48

SD/.AHI\ ED ABDULLA KHAN _-a S{ ISTANT REGISTRAR .---

¶49

//TRUE COPY// t\ SECTION OFFICER

¶50

To, '1. OneCCto SRI GOVARDHAN REDDYJOUNDLA, Adr :cate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State r f Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies

MMT NT

HIGH GOURT

DATED:1710912025

ORDER

WP.No.25516 of 2023

/') iiE S
(os//. t-r
',:') I n i )1,,q
'.:') }\Ct
i
',.* ^
"V, tPa'.r"c!.r;
-j l:_-:-:-.-12-