Disposed

K. Sathish Goud v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Sept 2025WP/21340/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought quashing of Crime No.306 of 2011 of Meerpet Police Station. During hearing it was submitted that investigation concluded and a final report was filed, cognizance taken as C.C.No.2307 of 2025 pending before the Magistrate. The court held the cause did not survive and closed the writ petition with liberty to raise all grounds in appropriate proceedings.

What the court decided

AI extract

K. Sathish Goud Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

i\f\

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTET\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 21340 OF 2017

¶8

Between:

¶9

K. Sathish Goud, S/o: Late Balaiah Age. 45 years, Occ Business R/o. H.No. 13-2-253, Kagajiguda Colony Pooranapool, Hyderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 022

¶13

2 The Station House Officer, PS trleerpet, Rachakonda Commissionerate Rangareddy District.

¶14

Sri Ranga Swamy, Circle lnspector of Police fi/eerpet Police Station Rangareddy District.

¶15

Sri Appala Raju, Sub lnspector of Police Meerpet P.S Rangareddy District.

¶16

Sri Patti Ramesh Reddy, S/o: P Ram Reddy Age. 40 years, Occ: Business o Velugupally Village Thungathurthy Mandel,"Nalgonda District.

¶17

Commissioner of Police Rachakonda Commissionerate, Rangareddy District.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari by calling for the records relat!,ng to F[ff,_$9,306 of 2011 dated 22-06-2011 on the file of PS Meerpet, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy district and quash the same as illegal.

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 26243 0F 20171

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the Petitioner in FIR No.306 of 2011 daled 22-06-',10'1 1 on the file of PS Meerpet, Rachakonda Commissionerate RangaReddy rJistrict.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶23

Between:

¶24

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad - 50O 022

¶25

Commis,sioner of Police Rachakonda Commissionerate, Rangareddy District.

¶26

The Station House Officer, PS Meerpet, Rachakonda Commissionerate Rangarr:ddy District

¶27

.,.PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶28

AND

¶29

'1 K. Sathish Goud, S/o: Late Balaiah Age. 45 years, Occ: Business R/o. H.trlo.1 3-2-253, Kagajiguda Colony^pooEnapoot, itydeiabad.

¶30

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶31

Sri Ranlya Swamy, Circle lnspector of Police Meerpet Police Station Rangare :ddy District.

¶32

J , SiiAsipzrla Raju, Sub lnspector of PolicdMeerpet P.S Rangaiedd y District 4. Sri Patti Ramesh Reddy, S/o: P Ram Reddy, Age. 40 years, Occ: Business Rl/o Velugupally Village Thungathurthy Mandel, Nalgonda District.

¶33

(Respondent nos.2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this petition)

¶34

...RESPONDENTS

¶35

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 04lO7l20 t 7 passed.in WPMP No. 26243 of 2017 in WP No. 21340 of 2017 and to dismiss the writ petition.

¶36

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. SRINIVAS SWAROOP REPRESENTING SRI K. DURGA PRASAD^{- *}

¶37

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l,2 and 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI M. KIRAN REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

¶39

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶40

IIIRIT PETITION o,2L34O of 2Ol-7

¶41

ORDER:

¶42

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.3O6 of 2O11 on the file of Meerpet Police Station, Cyberabad.

¶43

¶44

Heard Sri M. Srinivas Swaroop, learned counsel representing Sri K.Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri B.Sridhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of the official respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6 and Sri M.Kiran Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.S

¶45

¶46

During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the lnvestigation Officer, after conducting the investigation, filed final report before the VI Additional Junior Civil Judge, L.B.Nagar, and the said Magistrate taken cognizance and the same was numbered as C.C.No.2307 of 2025 and it is pending consideration.

¶47

,A ...1.i,f,

¶48

¶49

In vit:w of the above submissions, the cause in the writ petition do:s not survive for adjudication

¶50

i '

¶51

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to raise all the grounds which are available under law, including the grounds which are pleaded in the pr€sint writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶52

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

¶53

closed.

¶54

SD/.P.^{PONNA KRISHNA} ANT

//TRUE^COPY//

OFFICER

To,

l.OneCCtoSriK.DurgaPrasad,AdvocateIoPUC]

¶59

2." One^{CC to Sri Kiran Reddy' AdvocatbIOPUCI}

¶60

3.TwoCCstoGPforHome,HighCourtforthestateofTelangana,at Hyder,abad [OUT]

¶61

Two^{C;D Copies}

TJ BS @

HIGH COIJRT

DATED:1t6/09/2025

ORDER

WP.No.21340 of 2017

1 IiE S Ta Ic
0 6 tt[ 2u2[
f'
*
I
I

¶70

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶71

WITHOUT'COSTS

¶72

(

K. Sathish Goud v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

K. Sathish Goud v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Seethapathi Rao and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

Kolli Asha Vs The State of Telangana and 11 others

Nethi Sekhar and Another Vs The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Seethala Santosh Kumar, Hyderabad and 4 Others Vs Prl Secy, Home Dept, Hyderabad and Another

Rayala Santosh Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Anil Kumar Singh Vs The State of Telangna and 2 Others