Seethala Santosh Kumar, Hyderabad and 4 Others v. Prl Secy, Home Dept, Hyderabad and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Telangana High Court writ petition dismissed as infructuous; W.P. No. 42988 of 2016; writ of certiorari sought to quash DVC No. 3 of 2016 (XIXth Metropolitan Magistrate, R.R. Dist., Miyapur) over allegedly arbitrary and illegal cognizance violating natural justice and Articles 14 and 21; Article 226 petition; Section 151 CPC interim stay (I.A. No. 2 of 2016, WPMP No. 51025 of 2016); DVC disposed of by learned Magistrate during pendency so cause did not survive; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no precedent cases engaged.
What did the court decide?
The Court recorded the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that DVC No. 3 of 2016 was disposed of by the learned Magistrate during the pendency of the writ petition, and held that by virtue of that disposal the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication