Mandava Hothavya Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

[³³⁰²¹

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} ' -'1-Sp"ii't original J urisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,^{THE TWENTIETH DAY OFAUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE,K.SARATH}

¶6

WRIT^{PETITIONNO:2463 4 0F 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ivlandava^{Hothavya,W/o AvulaShivanathCh^owdarv'Aoed about 42 years'} occ - Pvt.^{rrplov#1"ilo 'H]'i'rbsi-r416-28'Fta{ No 402' Prasathi} Residencv,^{noau rtl=ol' '"r"i, 'rtr"'i- rtrivoiet'- errarathiNagar' Vijayawada} iUtUunl,^{VUryrwada, AndhraPradesh}

¶9

Avula^{Shivanath Chowdary,S/o AvulaJ-agan.t/ohanRao' Aged about 47} vears,^{occ - pvt um"piJG6'R/; H No z-ss' Karegam' Kotagiri' Karegoan'} [{izamabad^District'

¶10

3.AvulaJeevanBabu,,S/oSambasivaRao'.AgedaboutT0Vears'Occ-Retd' Employee,^{N o. 2-67',Xar.Js,;;;'i;t'gi ri' Kar"egoan' Nizamabad District'}

¶11

Avula^{TaraChowdary, W/o tvlalliped.d.i} Qubba^{Rao' Aoedabout 72 years' Occ} - Housewife,^{R/o. Flii N;' ;iis: bNM Residencv Arrioor Road' Beside Vijav} High School,^{nltuoarfi i'iXgJi"t'ii;;inio'r'rizari,r''oad District'}

¶12

N. Vineel,^{S/o N. RamaKrishna' Aged about 43 vears' Ocb - Pvt Employee'} RJo. H. No.^{3 5-13s/'i','?{;;;;s'';;' 3i'i'; N"sar' ftajenbra Nasar' Hvdersuda'} Ranga ReddY^District'

¶13

...PETITIONERS

¶14

AND

¶15

1 The State of^{Telangana,Rep by its.Principal Secretary'Revenue} Oepartment,^{Secrelariat,Hyderabad}

¶16

2

¶17

The District^{Collector, Ranga ReddyDistrict at Kongarakalan'}

¶18

a The District^{Registrar, Ranga ReddyDistrict'}

¶19

4

¶20

The Tahsildar,^{Balapur tt/andal, Ranga ReddyDistrict'}

¶21

E The Sub-Registrar,^{Champapet, Ranga ReddyDistrict'}

¶22

...RESPONDENTS

¶23

Petition under^{Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court may be} pleased to issue a^{Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus} declaringtheactionoftherespondentsinnotdeletingthepropertiesofthe petitioners i.e., open^{plotbearingPlot No l B part' admeasuring 335 Sq' Ydsin}

¶24

1 I l

¶25

/ i

¶26

Sy. No. 219, open plot bearing plot No. 22, admea 219, open ptot bearing ptot No. 17, admeasurin, .:tJ:rt;:::t;;TJr;,J;: open plot bearing plot No. 16, admeasuring 335 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 219 respectivery' Sureddy corony, Jalpary Virage, saroornagar Revenue r\rlandar, presenUy Balapur [Vlandi \4un c pa ty rrom the ., l;-jllllj,1il"?ill j;;,il:,f;,I;T: :HI a'owed w p No 2836812011 , dated og.o4-2012 in respect of the same properties mentioned in Sy. No. 219, situated at larparrv-vi;;" ";;J;r, representations Mandal presen,y by Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy the petitioners as iregar, arbitrary, O,",r., abuse ,""r," of ;.#;* process of raw,,a" against rules and violation of principles of Natural Ju: and consequenfly direct the respondents to derete the properties of the petitioners from the list of prohibited properties pursuant to the orders passed by this Hon,bre court in w.p. No 28368/20'1 1 dated 09.04.2012 by considering the representation submitted by the petitioners in the interest of justice.

¶27

IA NO: 10F 2025

¶28

petition under section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased To direct the respondents to delete the properties of ::ffi;:Jil:,1:^{o*''o'""'rng335} ', "i:T"JX:'l:'";,"; ;ffi ili *o 21e, open prot bearins prot No 17, admeasuri"r"# .i] il::,t.;ti::rt' J 9 and open prot bearing prot No. 1 6, admeasuring ar, ao. yds in Sy. No. 21 g flfl :lf ff ff::"i;: "' Reve n ue M a nd a' ""';["J::i I, : ff:i]';,"":: of Jalpally IVunicipality from the list of prohibited properties pursuant ,o ,n "'"" orders passed by this Hon,ble Court in W.p. No. 2836812011 dated On.OO.r," pet t oners, n the nterest ff.?:il::i:[i,[:ffi',",::::lifrI i:::,,lJ",n" 9::n""1^{for the petitioner: SRt} S.SURENDER REDDY c o u n s e I f o r t h e R e s po n d e n ts : S M T. S. s na'v-aiiii. . ASST.GP FOR sTAMps.Rr.io necrsrRertor.t

¶29

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶30

,.\

¶31

THE HONOU RABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK.SARATH}

¶32

WRIT PETI^{TION No.2463+ of 2o25}

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Heard Sri^{S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel} appearing^{for the petitioners and Smt S'sravanthi'} learned Assistant^{Government Pleaderfor Stamps and} Registration^{appearing for the official respondents' With} their consent,^{the Writ Petition is disposedof at the} stage of admission^itself.

¶35

Learned counsel^{for the petitionerssubmits} that the^{petitioners questioning theaction ofthe} respondents in^{notdeteting the properties ofthe} petitioners i.e.^{open plotbearing No' 18part} admeasuring^{335 Sq. Yards inSy'No'219' open plot} bearing Plot^{No. 22admeasuring3OO Sq' Yards in} Sy.No.219, open^{plot bearing No'17 admeasuring335} Sq. Yards in Sy.No.219^{and open plot bearingNo'16} admeasuring 335^{Sq. Yards inSy.No.219respectively}

¶36

situated at Sureddy^{Colony, JalpallyVillage,} Saroornagar Revenue^{Mandal, presently Balapur} Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{District, from the list of prohibited} - \

w

\

'''-.,

2

properties in spite of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.28368 of 20t l dated Og.O4.2Ol2. In view of the same requested this Court to consider the representation dated OZ.O4.2O2S for dc_notification of the subject properties of the petitionersr from prohibited properties list under Section 22_A of the Registration Act, 1908.

¶42

Learned Assistalt Government pieader for Stamps and Registration submits that the respondents wili consider the representation filed by the petitioners on 07.O4.2O25 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶43

4 In view of the submissions made on either side, without going into the merits of the case. the present writ petition IS disposed of directing the respondents to consider the representation filed bv the petitioners on OT.O4.2025 for de_notification of the subject properties of the petitioners from prohibited properties list as per the order of this Court in

¶44