Auto rickshaw welfare association members sought a mandamus directing Transport authorities to grant them appointments to represent grievances. On the Government Pleader's instructions that appointments were never denied, the Court directed respondent No.3 to give appointments as requested, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD rrr\Jrr vvvrrr' -'1-sp""i"t original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTHDAY OF-AI.IGUST TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:23',179oF 2025
Between:
AND
Petition underArticle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Court may be pleased to issuewrit order or direction especially one in the Nature of Writ of tvlandamusdeclaring the action of the respondents3 and 4 in not giving appointmentbypermittingthelstpetitioner.swelfareassociationofficebearers to representseveral genuine problems and issues of Three Wheeler Auto Rickshawownersanddriversisillegal,arbitraryandagainsttheprinciplesof naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondents3 and 4 to permitthe
:iF' *7 ;4
members of the 'l st pelitioner association and other office bearers by grvtng appointment enabling to represent several problems and issues of Th ree Wheeler Auto Rickshaw owners and drivers by considering the written representation of the 1sr petitioner association dt.2g-06-2025 in the interest of justice
lA NO: 1 oF 2025
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to permit the members of the .1st petitioner association and other office bearers by giving appointment enabling to represent severar probrems and issues of rhree wheerer Auto Rickshaw owners and drivers by considering the written representalion of the .l st petitioner association dt 28-06-2025 in the interest of justice, pending disposar of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioner: SRI CH.RAVINDER
Counsel for the Respondents: SRt M.VIcNESWAR REDDy, GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following: ORDER
SI(, J W.P.No.23179of 2025
I I
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K'SARATH
W.P.No .23L79of 202s
ORDER:
This writpetition is hled questioning the action of the respondentNos.3 and 4 in not givingappointmentbY Associationoffice permittingthe 1"t petitioner's Welfare bearers torepresentseveralgenuine problems and issues of ThreeWheelerAuto Rickshaw Owners and Drivers as illegal andarbitrar5i '
2
i' l i
I I
SI(, J W.P.No.23179 of 2025
4 In view of the submissiolls of the lcarned Government Pleader for Transport, the Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.3 to give appointment to the Members of the 1"r petitioner,s Associdtion to represent their grievance if any as and when the5, requested as per the written instructions submitted in the instant writ petition. No order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
To,
BSR ry/l.o
HIGH COURT
DATED:19t0Bt2O2S
ORDER
WP,No.23179 of 2O2S
'1::-.-
-r..r - tt.1- i'-.
/.4 { /,1.,.
,^ .'
(.,,
cil
2 0 [ttB 205 :'i
t)65o,11,-, rr'
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS
1
\Y
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Syed Jahangir
The Chief Secretary, State of Telangana
The Commissioner, Transport Department
The Joint Transport Commissioner, Regional Transport Authority, Hyderabad
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
