A writ petition seeking protection against dispossession from agricultural land was withdrawn by its counsel with liberty to file afresh; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petition; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[31681
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OFJULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WR lT PETITION NO:21474 OF2025
Between:
Puram Yadaiah, S/o- Puram Mallaiah Agedabout 75 Years,Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 15-31 , Vivekanand Nagar, Gajula Ramaram, Qutubullapurfirledchal- tValkajgiri DiStrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ more pa(icularly in the nature oflt/andamus declaringthe action of the respondents moreparticularlythat of the Respondents 2 and 3 .in seeking to disposes thePetitionerfrom the subjectland without issuing any notice and without following anyprocedureof law is challengedin this writ Petition as being arbitrary,illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) ( 2 )'21 and 300-A of the Constitution oflndia and consequentlydirect the Respondentsnot to interfere or dispossess thePetitionerfrom the subject land existing on2 Rooms in S. No. 345/2,admeasuringAc.4.O7Gts. situatedat Gajularamaram Village, Qutubullapur Mandal,Medchal-Malkajgiri District
e-a'
I
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition und,:r Section 151 CPCpraying that in the c rcumstancesstated in the affidavit filecl rn support of thepetition, the High CcLrr may be pleasedto direct the Responcienls not to demolishthe structureof 2 r-r'oms existing in Sy' No- 345/2, admeasuring Ac.4.O7 Gts., situatedat G:lt laramaram Village, Qutu bu llapur lvlandal. It/edchal-lrlalka.igiriDistrict
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.B. CHINNAIAH REP SRI VIJr\Y B PAROPAKARI
Counsel for the Respondents: GPFOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITIONNo.21474 0F 202s
ORA L ORDER:
Mr. I]. Chinnaiah'Iearnedcounsel represcnting Mr' ViiayLl' I'aropkari. lcamedcounsel for thc pctitioner,scekspermissionof thi: Clourt towithdrau'thc presentwrit petitionrT'itha liberty to lllc liesh u rit petition. IIehas alsomadean endorsement on the case bundlc ttl that eff'ect.
['crtnissionis accorded.
Granting liberly,as sought' the prescnt Writ l'ctitionis
dismissedas withdrawn. In the circumstanccsof thc casc there shall be no orderas to costs.
As a sequelthcreto, misc*llancouspetitions' if zrn'v ' pending in
ther,r'rit petitionshall stand closed
D M. OSMANALI BAIG STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
a
1 t
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410712025
ORDER
rl-
i 3 [tT 2025
ii';
\,
\i. )t'i:;,,.,.,, .. ':- ';:"
..::.-..-:.-z
WP.No.21474 ot 2025
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS VVITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
,{
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Puram Yadaiah
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
The Integrated Collectorate Office
The Tahsildar, Qutubullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
