Raju Nayak Vs The State of Telangana

Bajy Nayak, S/o. Late V. Naniya Nayak, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o-H.No.6-136, Mokila Thanda Village, Shankarpilly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

Ragya Nayak,, S/o. Late Varthya Puriya Nayak, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No.6-05/5, Mokila Thanda Vittage, Shankarpa'lly IVlandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

Ramulu Nayqk,,S/o. Late Varthya Lakya Nayak Aged about 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No.6-17, Mokila Thanda Village, Shankarpa[ly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

Naniya Nayqk, S/9 Late Dasya Nayak, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, FYo-H.No.6-091, Mokila Thanda Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

Gopal .Naya! Slg !a!e Varthya Lakya Nayak, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ryo.H.No.6-134, Mokila Thanda Village, Shankarpaily tvtandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶15

Jagan l.J.aVgk, Slo LaIe Dasya Nayak, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agricutture, R/o. H.No.6-1 15, Mokila Thanda Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

...PETITIONERS

¶17

AND

¶18

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govl., Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, T.S.

¶19

I The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

¶20

3 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

¶21

4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division,Chevella, RangaReddy. District.

¶22

5 The Tahsildar, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State

¶23

...RESPONDENTS

¶24

Petition under Article 226 of the constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 05.06.2o25 and 21 .0.4.202s of the petitioners with regard to the issuance of notices and fixing the date of hearing in Appeal No.F2l9.,l ol 2025 filed on 28.02 -2025 pending before the respondent No.2 in respect of lands bearing survey Nos.85/Part admeasuring Ac.1 0--l 6gts, g6/part admeasuring Ac.3-26gts, 93/Part admeasuring Ac.B-22 gts, 94/part admeasuring Ac.2_.1 0 gts, 95/Part admeasuring Ac.4-00 gts, total extent Ac.2B-34 gts, situated at Mokila Thanda village, Shankerpally Mandar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana state, as illegal, arbitrary and also violati6n of Articles i 4, 19 and Article 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and ,consequently direct the respondents forthwith to consider the representations dated 05.06.2025 and 21 .04.2025 of the petitioners with regard to the issuance of notices and fixing the date of hearing in Appeal No.F2l91 of 2025 filed on 2a.02.2025 pending before the respondent No.2 in respect of lands bearing Survey Nos.Bs/part admeasuring Ac.10-16gts, B6/part admeasuring Ac.3-26 gts. 93/Part admeasuring Ac.g-22 gts, g4lpart admeasuring Ac.2-1o gts, 95/Part admeasuring Ac.4-00 gts, total extent Ac 28- 34 gts, situated at Mokila Thanda virlage, shankerpally tvlandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

¶25

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶26

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou( may be pleased to direct the respondents forthwith to consider the representations dated 05.06.2025 and 21 .04.2025 of the petitioners with regard to the issuance of notices and fixing the date of hearing in Appeat No.F2l91 of 2o2s filed on 28.02.2025 pending before the 2nd respondent in respect of lands bearing Survey Nos.g5/part admeasuring Ac.10-16gts, B6/part admeasuring Ac 3-26 gts, 93lpan admeasuring Ac.8-22 gts, 94/Part admeasuring Ac.2-'10 gts, 95i part admeasuring

¶27

---7

¶28

Ac.4-00 gts, total extent Ac.2B-34 gts, situated at Mokila Thanda Village, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, pending disposal of Writ Petition.

¶29

Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s.R.MADHAV| LATHA

¶30

Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE

¶31

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶32

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHI{AN

¶33

WRIT PETITION No.21422 of 2025

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

Heard learned counsel fbr the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment pleader for Revenue for respondents.

¶36

2 According to the petitioners, they have preferred an appeal vide Appeal No.F2l91 of 2025 under section 90 of A.P.(T.A.) Tenancy.and Agriculture Lands Act, 1950 challenging the proceedings No.A/28 192 and proceedings No.A/2817105 in File No.U3 of respondent No.5 before respondent No.2. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said appeal, respondent No.2 is not disposing it of in

¶37

accordance with law. Therefore, petitioners herein have submitted a representation dated 05.06.2025 to respondent No.2 with a request to dispose of the said appeal. Even though, respondent No.2 did not consider the same. Aggrieved by the

¶38

2

¶39

\

¶40

said inaction of respondent No.2, petitioner has filed the

¶41

present wnt petttton.

¶42

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.2 will dispose of the said appeal strictly in accordance with law by putting the petitioners and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity of hearing

¶43

Though the petitioners are claiming that they have prefened the afbresaid appeal and it is numbered as F2l91 of 2025, they have not filed any proof of submission of the said appeal before respondent No.l. They have only filed a copy of the representation dated 05.06.2025 submitted to respondent No.2 with a request to dispose of the said appeal.

¶44

In the light of rhe said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of in the absence of respondents to the said appeal. Respondent No.2 is directed to dispose of the said Appeal No.F2i9l of 2025 filed by the peritioners, strictly IN accordance with law, by putting the petitioners and

¶45

3

¶46