Disposed

Sri. Puram Gopi krishna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Jul 2025WP/18850/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking release of high tension power supply to the petitioner's property without insisting on an occupancy certificate. The court, with consent, disposed of the petition at admission stage following its earlier order in W.P.No.8253 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release power supply subject to terms, conditions and undertaking to produce occupancy certificate within prescribed period.

Sri. Puram Gopi krishna Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[^{3301 I}

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELAN.GANAAT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

THURSDAY,^{THE THIRD DAY OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK}

¶6

WRIT PETITIO^{N NO:188sdoF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

¶9

3i1.,[::31,3:l]^{,[:"Xlt,?i:,',i,13l.:3[T{113il31,fi:'fi:"?:"'$J'uJ:fl&}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State d;r'#;"[ of^{d;iliZn'i' Telangana, Hv'i"'u5 n"b oV ad iit-?l'l!lP"l - 5ooo22Secretary' Power and Energy}

¶13

2 southern^{PoYv.e.r Dlt!r1,;:ffii"?8"*5';;^31,Irl3iff#Rep bv its} Chairman^{and Managtng ut}

¶14

ReP., by^The

¶15

3 Southern Superintending^{Power Engineer, Distribution t-l"pL'Xti""tv6"rcity Company Ltd ,} ^of^Telanoana,^{Circle' cybercity'}

¶16

4 Southern Divisional^{power Engineer, Distributron optt"tioi'iIl5tir.io"'gr' companyLtd of oiuitioni' rerangana. cvbercity circleRep by its Assistant} Shankarpally^{Municipality,Repby its Commissioner' RangareddyDrstrict'}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition^{undeiArticle226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filedtherewith' theHigh CourtmaYbe} pleased to issue^{an appropriateWrit' order or direction more particularly onetn} the nature^{of Wrlf of Mandamus declaring the actionof the 2 to 5 in not releasing} High Tension^{powersupply of 120 KVA to the petitioner property bearing PlotNo'} 47 tpatt, admeasuring^{2O2.22 Sq' yds, Plot No 46/Southern part (A) admeasuring} 58.333 Sq.^{yds and open plotadmeasuring4T lParl admeasuring7 '777 Sq} yds total admeasuring^{268.33 Sq yds or 224 32 Sq mts formingpart of Sy} No.

¶19

1B5Al1,1BSA]2 185\t'.1B5A/4,.t854/5, 185,4/6 and 18SA17,in N R. Residency situated at Sl-;rnk a-rrally village and Municipality, shar kartr,all1, Ma ndal, Rangareddy Distri6[ .,'66 Registered sare Deed as iregar, .ur, v.id ar:itrary and consequen'y drrr)ct t r: Respondents 2 to 5 to release the povrerr : upply without insisting for occu;ta nr:! :ertificate.

¶20

lA NO: 1 oF 202,5

¶21

Petition ur(jef i:;r)rtion 151 CPC praying that in the circums[arces stated in the affidavit fired in s;up port of the petittn, the High court mery b ) p,eased to direct Responder;fi 2 r ) 5 to rerease High rension power s upp y ctr 12) KVA to the petitioner prop,:rty be aring plot No. 47lpart, admeasuring 202.2,.2,. )q yds, plot No. 46/Southern grrrrl (r\r udmeasurini Sg.333 Sq. yds and open f,lot ; dmeasuring 4TlParl admeasullq ), ,77 Sq. iU, totat admeasuring 268 33 Srl \tcs ot 224.32 Sq.mts forming pe,1 of Si , No. 1B5A/1, lBSA/2,18SAi3, 1BS,\t4,.185/5 .l854/6 and 1B5A/7, in N Ft Re; dency situated at Shankarpally villaqe and Irlunicipality, Shan ka rpa lly [\rlanrl.rl Fla r gareddy District

¶22

Counsel for the petitior,rrr,: SRI NIKITA GOENKA

¶23

Counsel for the Responclent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGY

¶24

counsel for the Respond€ nts No.2 to 4: sRr N. SREEDHAR REDD.,

¶25

S.C. FOR TSSPDC -

¶26

counsel for the Respon Jent No.s: sRr G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDy

¶27

S.C. FOR GHMC

¶28

The Court made ther follorving: ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE^SRI WSTICE^PULLAKARTHIK

¶30

tI/.P.No. 18850 of2o25

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

With the consent of the^{parties, this writ petition} 1S being disposed of at^{the stage of admission.}

¶33

The writ^{petitionis filed w"ith the followingprayer:}

¶34

"To issue a Writ,^{orderor direction more particularly one in the nature} of Writ of Mandamus,^{declaring tl'le action of respondents Nos'2 to 5 in not} releasing High Tension^{Power Supplyof 120 KVA to the petitioner property} bearing Plot^{No.47/part,'admeasuring2O2 22} sq yards' Plot No.46/Southern^{part (A) admeasuring58 333 sq yards arld open plot} No.47/paft admeasuring^{7 .777sq.yardstotaladmeasuring26833 sq'yards} or 224.32 sq.mts^{formingof Sy.Nos.185,{} /1,^{las{l2'185A/3' 1854/4'} 185A/5, 1854/6 ald^{185A/7 in N.R.Residency situated at Shankarpally} Village and Municipa-lity,^{Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrictvide} registered sake^{deed, as illegat, nul1, void, arbitrary and consequently direct} the respondents 2^{to 5 to release t}le power supplywithout insisting for} occupancy certiflcate^{ald to passsuch order or orders -"}

¶35

3.HeardMs.NikitaGoenka,learnedcounselforthepetitioner; learned Qvemment^{Pleader forEnerry forrespondent No'1;} Sri N.Sreedhar^{Reddy, learned StandingCounselfor TelanganaState} Southern Power Distribution^{Company Limited, for respondentNos'2} to 4; and Sri G.Madhusudhan^{Reddy, learnedStanding Counsel for} Greater Hyderabad Municipal^{Corporation, for respondentNo'5'}

Yl \

Learr.erl counsel for the petitioner subr nits th a.t the subject matter c I th is Writ Petition is squareiy covere :1 br- t h : o rder of this Court rn \V F). \ c.8253 of 2025 dated 19.03.20!15. :rn<l recuested this Court to 1t,,rss similar order in the present Writ I)e titiot-r also. The same is r.ro1 :;r roLrsly disputed by the learned C.overtrr en1. Pleader as well as k:rrrn,. rI Standing Counsel for the resporrder t,s.

¶40

In vieu' ,r the above submissions ald fo^- th: r.eascns alike in the orde- of .lris Court in W.P.No.8253 of 2025, rlatel 19.03.2025, this Writ l)etit on is disposed of directing the r::sporrclt.nt:; to release the powt:- sr. p rlv to the premises of the petitioner r;r-rbject to the complian<:,: ,:rl the tertns and conditions ar: d orL urnishing an underterking tr produce the occupancy certiflcar e frrrL ,he concerned Municipal^()org oration within a prescribed period, errLd if no such occupan(./ r:<:r[ ficate is produced within such period, it is open to the respc,;tci en . r to take appropriate action in a.ccorda nct: with law.

¶41

Misct:llarr ous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. There shzLll ltt: r o order as to costs.

¶42

SD/.I!IOHD. ISMAIL DEPTJT'/ REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ i sEcT tot't oFFtcER

¶43

To, t 1 The Pfinri:al !i,:1161rr, Power and Energy Department. Sitate of 1elangana, Secretaria,.. llyCe rabad-500022.

¶44

2 The Chairrnan a rrd li,4anaging Director, Southern Powe r Dil;tribr rtiorr Company Ltd., of Terlang:tn a, It/lint Compound, Hyderabad.

¶45

, The Superirrerr,lng Engineer, Southern Power Distributiorr Corpany Ltd., of lelangan I O;,..11,on Cybercity Circle. Cybercity.

¶46

.. t.

¶47

The Assistant Divisional Enoineer,^{operation,SouthernPower Distribution} Company Ltd. of Telangana,^{lbrahimbagh Division, CybercityCircle-}

¶48

The Commissioner, Shankarpally^{Municipality, RangareddyDistrict.}

¶49

One CC to SRI NIKITA GOENKA,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶50

fwo CCs to GP for Energy,^{High Courtfor the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶51

B One CC to SRI N SREEDHAR^{REDDY, S.Cfor TSSPDCL} [OPUC]

¶52

g One CC to SRI G, MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' S.C for GHMC [OPUC]

¶53

'10. Two CD Copies

¶54

MP t+BS

I I

CC TODAY

HIGH COURT

DA'IED:0310712025

l': =.-.-
-'':.i ': , ).:\r.,.
,1
".'ai' {\a-..<br>Wi t,l
I e ,,1$' i

¶62

ORDER

¶63

WP.Nrc.188li0 of²⁰²⁵

¶64

DISPOSING OF THE^{WRIT PETITION} ,.

¶65

WITHOI'T COSTS c F ; Ili^r,.

¶66

Sri. Puram Gopi krishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Puram Gopi krishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Heemankshi Bakers Pvt.Ltd., Vs The State of Telangana

Danagiri Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana

A M K Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Kampati Vijaya Vs The state of Telangana

Emmadi Ramarao Vs State of Telangana

M/S.Suguna Metals Pvt.Ltd Vs the M.D., Apcpdcl., and 3 Others