Disposed

Danagiri Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Jul 2025WP/18488/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged an ejectment decree under the Telangana Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation and the non-consideration of their statutory appeal. The Court, without going into merits, directed the appellate authority to pass orders on the appeal within three months after hearing the parties, with status quo maintained meanwhile.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.2 directed to decide Appeal No.A4/LTR/04/2025 per law, preferably within three months; parties to maintain status quo on the land till then.

Danagiri Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

wRrr PETTION No: 1848b oF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

'1 . Danagiri Ramulu, s/o late Pothanna, (wrongly mentioned as Jellappa), aged abouf65 years, occ- Agriculture, r/o H.No.3-234,^{Bazarhatnoor,villageand} lvlandal, District Adilabad.

¶9

Chilakuri Bhoomaiah, s/o Late Ramulu, aged about 64^{years, occ. Agriculture,} r/o H.No.3- 1 35, Bazarhatnoor. village and Mandal,^{DistrictAdilabad.}

¶10

Alka Ganesh, s/o Late Bhoianna, aged about 62^{years,occ. Agriculture, r/o} H.No.4-490, Bazarhatnoor, village and Mandal, District^Adilabad.

¶11

Katike Kishan, s/o Late Gangaram, aged about^{65 years, occ. Petty business,} r/o Bazarhatnoor village and Mandal, District Adilabad.

¶12

Teliponi @ Vadla Pandari, s/o late Ramaiah,^{aged about72 ye.ars, occ.} Retired givernment employee, r/o H.No.6-69,^{Bazarhatnoor,village and} lMandal' District Adilaba

¶13

..pETrroNERS

¶14

AND

¶15

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by Principal Secretary,^{TribalWelfare} Department, Secretariat, at Hyderabad.

¶16

2 Th6 Additional Agent to the Government and^{Project Officer,l.T-D.A,} Adilabad, Head Quarters at Utnoor, Post Utnoor,^{District Adilabad.}

¶17

3 The Special Deputy Collector^(TW), Head Quarter Utnoor,^{DistrictAdilabad.} 4 The District Co{lector, Adilabad, District Adilabad. The Tahsikjar, Bazarhatnoor Mandal, Adilabad,^{District Adilabad.}

¶18

o Jalke Mukunda Rao, s/o Late Maruthi,^{rlo Near Grampanchayath} Bazarhatnoor, village and t/andal Bazarhatnoor,^{District Adilabad-S04304-}

¶19

7 Jalke Narayana, s7o late Maruthi, r/o Near^{GrampanchayathBazarhatnoor,} village and tt/andal Bazarhatnoor, District Adilabad-504304.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of lhe^{Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Courtmay be} pleased to pass an order, or orderp, direction or issue^{a writ more particularly} one in the nature of^writ of^{Certiorari, (i) by calling the records relating to} Judgment and Ejectment^{Decree passed by the RespondentNo-3 in case} No.TWAI/65/2023 dated. 28-04-2025^{invoking the provisions of Telangana state} scheduled Areas Land Transfer^{Regulationand set asidethe same declaring it}

¶22

"{t

¶23

Jt--7

¶24

as illegal arbilrary^{violativeof Article} 14,21^{and 300-A of the Constitution of} lndia and aga'nllt^{t r} 3^provisions of Tetangana^{Schedul,ld A real Land Transfer} Regutation,⁽ⁱⁱ t tu'tlr:r declare^{the actionof the respondent no 2 in not giving} speedy reltef :v^r;rr sidering the^{stay petition filedalong with : tatutoryappeal} protecting fronr^{rlis::ssession} of the subject immoveable^{properti>s of petitioners} is illegal

¶25

lA NO:¹ OF 2025

¶26

Petition und:r Section 151 CPC^praying'that in the c rcur tstances stated in the affidavit f lerl ir support of the^{petition,the High(lourl ma} /^{be pleased to} direct the R€rspc,ijent no.1 to 5'that not to evicl/^{dispor;sess following} immoveable^{prc per} ies of^petitioners i.e.^{(i) PetitionerNo.1} D.^Ramulu,H.No. 3-234 lo the oxter)1 of^{1 gunta,(ii) Petitioner No.2 Chilkuri Bhoomaiah, sheds} Nos. 3-202, 3-2'-,!1 i: the name of Chilkuri Bhoomaiah and^{sredsNos. 3-222,3-} 227 in lhe narnr: of^()hilkuri Lalith'a i.e.^wife of^{PetitionerNo 2 to the extentof 3} guntas, (iii) Pe,tit o r:r No.3 AIke Ganesh, H.No,3-239 to the exh:nt of 2^guntas, (iv) Katike Kisl-ran l-l No.3-354 in the name of his wife h oyalka" \arsubai to the extent of 2^{gurt,as; (v)} Teleponi @ Vadla Pandari^H.No6-911. to the extent of^I gunta, the tot:,Ll an(l is situated in Sy.No.13'l/a of Bazarhatnoor village, Mandal Bazarhatnoor, [)is;.ri,;t Adilabad, by suspending the Jtrdgnrent and Ejectment Decree passe<l .ry tlr3 Respondent No.3 in case No.TWA1165l2O23 dated.28-042025, pending^{rJispc s;a1} of main writ^petition, for the inter€rst oi^jus ice.

¶27

Gounsel for the Pe titioner: SRl. S. CHANDRASEKHAR

¶28

Counsel for the Rr,s;pondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR SOC|AL^WE LFARE

¶29

Counsel for th€,Raspondent Nos.4&5: GP FOR REVENUE

¶30

Counsel for the,Raspondent Nos. 6&7: -

¶31

The Court made tl'e following: ORDER

¶32

THE HON,BLE^{SRI JUSTICE} PULLA KARTHIK

¶33

WRIT PETITION No.r8488 0F 2025

¶34

ORD ER:

¶35

This Writ^{peririonis filed,} under Article 226 of the Constitution

¶36

"_-_to pass an orcler,^{or oralers, direclio-n} or directions, or issue rz tunt, more partlcularlg one tt tle noture of Lont of C,eiiorari, (t) by calling tn i"*ra. rclating to Jud7t c t otd^EiPctmc t Decree possed bg the Respondent No.3 ii co-se N'.TWA l / tt.5/ 202J^{dated,:28 O4 2O25} inuoking the proustons of Telangana State Schec)uLer1 Areds Lold^Tratlsfer Rerylatton and set aside the iame declanng it as tll.,gdl arbtrary,^uiolatiue of Articte 14, 2l & 3OOA of the Cnnstitution ol lrtdrt antl^ageinst tlte^{prousion^s} of Telangana Scheduled Area_s Lond frun[ R.,!thttto . ltt) fur1-lp_r dcrlarc the actton oJ the respondent no.2 in not giuing speedll relkd blt^considering the s.tag petttion liled along uitlt statutorlJ appeal protectitlq /rorn drspo-s.sPssiort of the sublect imnoueabie properties if Petitioners^Ls ilegal^and Poss^'

¶37

Heard Sri S.ChAndra Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare for respondent Nos.l to 3; and learned Government pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.4 and 5. With their consent, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the unofficiar respondents filed Case No.TWAl/65/2023 before respondent No.3 alleging that the petitioners hacl occupied the subject land and constructed residential houses. Vide judgment, dated 2g.O4.2O25, respondent No_3 directed that possession of the subject land be resorted to the unofficial respondents by ejecting the petitioners. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred Appeal No.AalLTR/04 /2025 before respondent No.2. However, no orders

¶39

¶40

¶41

have^{been pirsse' I ;o far' Therefore' Iearned counsel'ravs t tis Court} to^{direct resl>:rn l:nt No 2 to consider the aforesaidapFeallnd pass} appropriate^{c)r-d':I s lvithin a stipulated period of time}

¶42

¶43

Learn:rl^{( i:'ernmentPleader appearing for ihertrs pondents} fairly^{subm1 .: I l- i.t respondent No.2 will passappl opr att: orderstn} the^{Appea ,li iA4 / LTR/0 41 2025 filed by thtpctr tl rners} 1n accordancc^{r(it!rl eu'.}

¶44

HavirLg^{rr- ! rLrd to the submissionsmade by Ie arn:d c lunselfor} the^{respectLv(, p trties and withoutgoinginto the rrreri s ')the case'} this^{Writ F'e::itir:r' is disposed of directing respolr(lcntNc 2 to pass} appropriat<:^{cn'rl-'rs in the AipealNo'A4/LTR/Ol:1025:i ed by the} str^{( Ilv in accordancewith larr""afterp-rtti:-rg t re affected} petltloners : ot^r l^{and after providing an opportulrit-v of I earing'as} parties^on expetlitiouslr'^{l;possible, preferablywithin a periorlcthree (3)} montbs^{fr,lrn ]tc date of receipt'of a copy of tl ls c,rde 'Till the} disposal^o 'hr,^{: foresaidappeal'the parties are d rectedt I maintain} stotus-quo,'rbr^{. rnlng as on today' wi[h regard to tlre srrbie:t land}

¶45

Misr:.:]Iert.eouspetitionspending,ifany,s,lrallstrnclclosed.

¶46

There sha I^{l.>e rll order as to costs}

¶47

nssrsrsf;iliAJ#t?[iF,/

¶48

I/TRUE^COPY//

¶49

SE')TION^OFFICER r "'

¶50

To,

¶51

i 1,,u,:pNl,;0,ffi $^{:g*i t:''}

¶52

i t,HIfi

¶53

a .i::i:

¶54

¶55

Two CCs to^{GP FOR SOCIALWELFARE,High Courtfor the State of} Telangana at HYderabad [OUT]

¶56

s. T;; ia; to cir^{FoRREVENUEHigh court for the Stateof Telangana,at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶57

Two CD CoPies BM GJP

1-t3ⅈ

I I I I

3C TODAY

HIGH COL'FIT

DATED:02 l[it 12025

( -

ORDER

WP.No.1848il of 2025

.-1: ::'--.
tii :, :.-1i
(_).i. fzfl
t-.1.
,,(.,
{
'..,./

¶68

DISPOSING I]IF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶69

./+ 1 -.5 ?,/7^,,/15

Danagiri Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Danagiri Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Meenakshi Infrastructures Private Limited Vs Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited

S.Krupakar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Vinayak Steels Ltd., Vs The Southern Power Distribution Company of

Bethamcharla Yelamanda (Died as per Lr P2) Vs The State of Telangana

Chennoju Bramha Chary Vs The Telangana Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd.

Gajanan Tamra Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana