D. Srinivasa Rao, Nalgonda District v. the Asst. Labour Officer, Nalgonda Dist and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs (High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, WP No. 16018 of 2006, decided 03-09-2025) by Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, J.; original prayer: writ of certiorari under Article 226 against orders dt. 29-04-2006 passed in MW No. 321O2 by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nalgonda (challenged as illegal, arbitrary); earlier suspension sought via I.A. No. 2 of 2006 / WPMP No. 19960 of 2006 under Section 151 CPC; counsel Sharath for Srinivas Dammalapati; respondents Asst. Labour Officer, Kodad and Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Nalgonda with GP for Labour; no precedent cited, no amounts; useful only as an example of dismissal-on-infructuity, not as a source of any substantive holding.
What did the court decide?
Recording counsel's submission that the cause in the Writ Petition did not survive for adjudication and had become infructuous, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, directed that there shall be no order as to costs, and closed the miscellaneous applications pending in the writ petition.