Dr Dilip Bhanushali, Hyd v. Smt. Kusum P. Ghatage, Us of Americal and Three Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous dismissal of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1123 of 2017 (Telangana High Court, 31-01-2025; Shavili and Eada, JJ.). Arose from suit O.S.No.281 of 2011 on the file of the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; the appeal lay under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC against the order dated 01-0g-2017 in I.A.No.502 of 2016. Concerned ground floor portion of premises Nos.3-2-836 and 3-2-836/1, admeasuring 1210 square yards at Kachiguda, Hyderabad, with an interlocutory petition (I.A.No.2 of 2017 / CMA MP No.1940 of 2017) under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC r/w Section 151 CPC seeking an Advocate Commissioner for local inspection regarding running of a clinic in the ground floor. Appellant (name as printed, OCR-degraded): Qltip Bhanushali; Respondents: Smt Kusum P Ghatage (since deceased), Dr Prakash P Ghatage, Dr Praful P Ghatage and Arun P Gala — no relief claimed against Respondents 1 to 3. Outcome: appeal dismissed as infructuous on counsel's statement; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed; no merits decided; no case law cited or discussed. Statute references captured as printed (OCR-degraded): 'order 43 Rure 1 of cpc', 'Order 26 Rule 9 of CpC', 'Section 151 CpC'.