Appeal against a City Civil Court decree was listed for dismissal as appellants' counsel did not appear; the High Court dismissed the appeal for default and non-prosecution with no order as to costs, closing pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
, THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 90 OF 2007
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 01 .12.2005 made in O.S. No. 412 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Xl Additional Chief Judge, (Fast Track Court) City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
...Appellants/Defendants
AND
... Respondents/Plaintiffs
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2007(CCCAMP. N O: 236 OF 2007)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of execution of the decree and Judgment dated 01 . i 2.2005 passed in OS No 4't2l.1999 on the file ofthe Xl Addl Chief Juge, CCC, FTC, Hyderabad including payment of costs pending disposal of the appeal
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(CCCAMP. NO: 4 OF 2009
Between:
AND
Petition under section15'1 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleas-edto vacate the interim orders dated17-4-2007 in cccAMP.No.236 0f 2007 in cccA.No. 90 of 2007 and topass suchother order or ordersas aredeemedfit and properin the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Appellants: Sri V. Venkata Ramana(Not present)
Counsel for the Respondents:Sri D. Jagan Mohan Reddy
The Court deliveredthe following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HON'BLTISMT.IUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
C.C.C.A.No.90 OF 2007
IUDGMENT:(l']er J-{on'ble Sri Jushce Abhinand Kumar Shavili)
Despite listing the nlatter under the caption 'fr>r dismissal',
there is no represerltation on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, this Court has rro other option except to dismiss lht: appcal for
default or llon-prosecution.
shall be no order as to costs
Miscellaneous Applicatiorls, if any, pending irr tl.ris appeal
shall stancl closecl
Sd/- I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,o\ut" / 1.1sEcrroru oFFtcER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:30/01/2025
JUDGMENT
GCCA.No.90 of 2007
' rr€
:'{.G
t
'' ) 0I IPR 2025 C
. i. *.f
. * -
- l'r'!--" ^tif
--=r-
APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
C (,d^ ffiw
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s S.S.K. Benefit Fund Ltd
M/s Sri Sahasraquna Mutual Benefit Society
Nagari Pandusa
Sri Somavamsa Sahasrarjuna Kshatriya Samaj
Pujari Rajeshwar
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
